H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne White vs Annabel Croft H2H: 2-0
Anne White holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne White leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne White won the 1987 Phoenix fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anne White | 7-5 6-1 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Anne White | 6-2 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne White | #262 | #19 | 20 | 1,846 | 110 | 118 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne White | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |