H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne White vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Anne White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne White won the 1986 Chicago third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1986* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne White | 6-4 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1986* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 7-6 6-1 | Anne White | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-1 6-3 | Anne White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne White | #262 | #19 | 20 | 1,846 | 110 | 118 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne White | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1981 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1982 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1983 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1984 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |