H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anne White vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 3-2
Anne White holds a 3–2 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 2–1 on grass, while Anne White leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1984 Sydney second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-4 7-6 | Anne White | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anne White | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1983* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Anne White | 7-6 2-6 10-8 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1982* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Anne White | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1981* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Anne White | 6-4 6-1 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne White | #262 | #19 | 20 | 1,846 | 110 | 118 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne White | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1984 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #44 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |