H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne White vs Zenda Liess H2H: 1-0

Anne White holds a 1–0 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne White leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne White won the 1980 Tampa round of 64 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne White 6-3 6-2 Zenda Liess Match data Nov 12, 1980* R64 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne White #262 #19 20 1,846 110 118 48.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Zenda Liess 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne White Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1974 7–7 50.0% 1,554 0 0
15 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,573 0 0
16 1978 2–1 66.7% 1,531 0 0 1976 7–4 63.6% 1,668 0 0
17 1977 4–13 23.5% 1,619 0 0
18 1980 8–9 47.1% 1,597 0 0 1978 16–17 48.5% 1,742 0 0
19 1981 14–16 46.7% 1,685 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% 1,662 0 0
20 1982 12–16 42.9% 1,685 0 0 1980 1–4 20.0% 1,610 0 0
21 1983 25–19 56.8% 1,753 0 0
22 1984 18–18 50.0% #45 1,753 0 0
23 1985 12–11 52.2% #44 1,801 0 0
24 1986 9–16 36.0% #51 1,704 0 0
25 1987 9–10 47.4% #57 1,664 0 1
28 1990 1–2 33.3% 1,659 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne White Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1974 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1978 2 1 3 66.7% 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
20 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1983 11 4 15 73.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1987 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 41 37 78 52.6% 20 21 41 48.8% 32 29 61 52.5% 16 29 45 35.6% 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne White Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1974 1554 119.5 -29 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) +0.30
15 1975 1574 114.9 +15 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 -0.13
16 1978 1531 107.1 +106 66.7% +1.67 1–0 +0.53 1976 1669 124.1 +28 59.1% +1.09 1–1 +0.18
17 1977 1619 124.4 -92 +63 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1980 1598 123.8 +3 -9 48.8% -0.24 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.16 1978 1743 135.7 -78 -37 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1981 1686 131.1 +9 -12 -97 45.1% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 0–2 -1.18 1979 1662 120.1 -29 -5 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.45
20 1982 1686 128.5 -9 -60 -23 41.3% -0.63 5–4 (56%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.87 1980 1610 95.3 -77 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 -0.03
21 1983 1754 133.6 -45 -69 +24 54.5% +0.26 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 106.4 +0.48
22 1984 1753 134.8 -56 -30 +61 50.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -0.30
23 1985 1802 136.9 -6 -89 -34 51.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 -0.36
24 1986 1704 130.7 +38 -58 +59 37.7% -0.83 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 97.0 -1.10
25 1987 1665 120.7 +32 +98 47.6% -0.02 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) +0.77
28 1990 1660 111.9 +10 33.3% -2.17 2–1 (67%) +0.04
Career 1846 137.9 -5 -42 +12 47.6% -0.23 30–28 (52%) 19–26 (42%) 99.8 -1.38 1744 131.4 -71 +6 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.