H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne White vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-2

Zina Garrison holds a 2–1 lead over Anne White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1986 Oakland round of 32 6-4 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne White
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #9 6-4 3-6 6-1 Anne White #20 Match data Feb 27, 1986* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Anne White 6-2 6-2 Zina Garrison #6 Match data Sep 27, 1985* R16 New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison #7 7-6 6-1 Anne White #37 Match data Jan 13, 1984* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne White #262 #19 20 1,846 110 118 48.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne White Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1978 2–1 66.7% — 1,531 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
18 1980 8–9 47.1% — 1,597 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1981 14–16 46.7% — 1,685 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1982 12–16 42.9% — 1,685 0 0 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1983 25–19 56.8% — 1,753 0 0 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1984 18–18 50.0% #45 1,753 0 0 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1985 12–11 52.2% #44 1,801 0 0 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1986 9–16 36.0% #51 1,704 0 0 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1987 9–10 47.4% #57 1,664 0 1 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1990 1–2 33.3% — 1,659 0 1 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne White Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1978 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1983 11 4 15 73.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1987 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career — 41 37 78 52.6% 20 21 41 48.8% 32 29 61 52.5% 16 29 45 35.6% — 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne White Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1978 1531 107.1 — — — — +106 — — 66.7% +1.67 — 1–0 — +0.53 1980 1529 117.3 — — — — +48 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.25
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1570 122.3 — — — — +74 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.08
18 1980 1598 123.8 — — — — +3 -9 — 48.8% -0.24 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.16 1982 1854 155.0 — — — — -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1981 1686 131.1 — — — — +9 -12 -97 45.1% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 0–2 — -1.18 1983 1991 154.6 — — — — -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1982 1686 128.5 — — — — -9 -60 -23 41.3% -0.63 5–4 (56%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.87 1984 2013 157.3 — — — — +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1983 1754 133.6 — — — — -45 -69 +24 54.5% +0.26 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 106.4 +0.48 1985 2033 160.2 — — — — +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1984 1753 134.8 — — — — -56 -30 +61 50.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -0.30 1986 2001 159.2 — — — — +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1985 1802 136.9 — — — — -6 -89 -34 51.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 -0.36 1987 1988 166.8 — — — — +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1986 1704 130.7 — — — — +38 -58 +59 37.7% -0.83 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 97.0 -1.10 1988 2043 162.0 — — — — +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1987 1665 120.7 — — — — +32 — +98 47.6% -0.02 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.77 1989 2135 170.0 — — — — +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2041 161.7 — — — — +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1964 153.9 — — — — +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 1990 1660 111.9 — — — — +10 — — 33.3% -2.17 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.04 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1889 145.3 — — — — +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1868 147.9 — — — — +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.8 — — — — +23 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career — 1846 137.9 — — — — -5 -42 +12 47.6% -0.23 30–28 (52%) 19–26 (42%) 99.8 -1.38 — 2146 164.6 — — — — +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.