H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Annette Van Zyl vs Almut Sturm H2H: 1-0
Annette Van Zyl holds a 1–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annette Van Zyl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Annette Van Zyl won the 1968 Hamburg third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1968* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Annette Van Zyl | 6-2 6-1 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annette Van Zyl | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |