H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annika Beck vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-1
Annika Beck and Marina Erakovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Annika Beck leads 1–0 on clay, while Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2016 Gstaad third round 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Annika Beck | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2013* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Annika Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annika Beck | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |