H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Annika Beck vs Shahar Peer H2H: 1-0
Annika Beck holds a 1–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annika Beck leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2013 Bad Gastein third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2013* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Annika Beck | 7-5 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annika Beck | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |