H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Annika Beck vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 1-1
Annika Beck and Urszula Radwanska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Annika Beck leads 1–0 on grass, while Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2015 's Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Annika Beck | 6-2 6-4 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2013* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-3 6-1 | Annika Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annika Beck | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |