H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Rus vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Rus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Palermo fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 35
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2009* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Arantxa Rus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Rus | #183 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,788 | 89 | 163 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arantxa Rus | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #80 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #157 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #116 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |