H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Arantxa Rus vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 1-0
Arantxa Rus holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Rus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arantxa Rus won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 35
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Arantxa Rus | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Rus | #183 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,788 | 89 | 163 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Rus | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #170 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #80 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #157 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #116 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |