H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 0-2
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 2–0 lead over Aravane Rezai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2009 Beijing second round 4-6 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 4-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |