H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 1-1
Aravane Rezai and Ekaterina Bychkova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on clay, while Ekaterina Bychkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Bychkova won the 2007 Miami first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-1 6-4 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2006* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Aravane Rezai | 6-4 6-2 | Ekaterina Bychkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |