H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aravane Rezai vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-1
Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Aravane Rezai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2009 Fes third round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2009* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Shahar Peer | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aravane Rezai | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 |