Ashley Harkleroad
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 2, 2006 | H2H |
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | 1 | 2 | 3 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Ashley Harkleroad in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Charleston Open round of 64 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Castano | 6-2 6-0 | Ashley Harkleroad | Match data | Apr 12, 2006* | R64 | Charleston Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Harkleroad | #1,051 | #39 | 821 | 1,681 | 51 | 79 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,702 | 83 | 110 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashley Harkleroad | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #67 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #133 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1020 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ashley Harkleroad | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 35 | 52 | 87 | 40.2% | 14 | 19 | 33 | 42.4% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 45 | 71 | 36.6% | 56 | 55 | 111 | 50.5% | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 65/120 of Ashley Harkleroad's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ashley Harkleroad | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2003 | 6/28 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 71.5% | 58.8% | 40.9% | 55.5% | 33.7% | 53.6% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 3/20 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 73.5% | 51.7% | 34.3% | 37.5% | 84.8% | 47.2% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 1/4 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 57.1% | 25.0% | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | 19.0% | 27.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 15/24 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 66.1% | 60.3% | 42.4% | 48.5% | 43.6% | 54.0% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 20/21 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 71.1% | 56.9% | 42.2% | 50.3% | 43.1% | 52.5% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 19/21 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 68.3% | 57.6% | 42.7% | 48.2% | 45.4% | 52.9% | 44.6% | 2003 | 1/5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 62.5% | 45.7% | 38.1% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 42.9% | 39.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3/14 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 64.4% | 45.1% | 37.0% | 43.9% | 46.7% | 42.2% | 37.8% |
| 25 | 2010 | 1/2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 72.5% | 48.6% | 42.9% | 44.4% | 50.0% | 47.1% | 31.9% | 2005 | 5/40 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 58.6% | 61.1% | 43.2% | 52.7% | 40.0% | 53.5% | 41.1% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20/47 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 61.3% | 58.8% | 42.7% | 49.0% | 49.5% | 52.2% | 42.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 22/30 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 62.1% | 58.1% | 43.9% | 50.7% | 38.5% | 52.8% | 41.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11/15 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 61.4% | 61.7% | 48.0% | 58.5% | 56.5% | 55.8% | 42.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 54.9% | 64.2% | 38.5% | 51.0% | 55.0% | 52.6% | 43.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9/10 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 63.4% | 60.6% | 47.4% | 45.7% | 45.1% | 55.5% | 46.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 11.0 | 60.6% | 60.7% | 34.9% | 51.9% | 55.9% | 50.8% | 46.8% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 9.3 | 55.0% | 58.9% | 33.8% | 42.4% | 39.5% | 47.8% | 46.7% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 48.9% | 48.9% | 46.8% | 60.0% | 30.8% | 47.8% | 47.9% |
| Career | — | 65/130 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 69.1% | 57.2% | 41.5% | 48.8% | 44.4% | 52.2% | 42.7% | — | 80/193 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 61.1% | 58.8% | 43.4% | 50.3% | 45.8% | 52.6% | 42.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ashley Harkleroad | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1479 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 1502 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 1592 | 121.9 | -0.82 | +0.82 | 0.967 | 49.5% | -59 | +93 | — | 49.1% | -0.04 | 1–6 (14%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.4 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1581 | 123.9 | -1.88 | -0.09 | 0.856 | 46.1% | 0 | +53 | — | 42.9% | -0.62 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.0 | -0.37 | 1999 | 1484 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2005 | 1529 | 99.7 | -1.98 | -1.34 | 0.341 | 24.0% | +12 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.09 | 2000 | 1487 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1550 | 119.5 | -0.91 | -2.27 | 0.871 | 47.1% | +17 | +27 | — | 41.5% | -0.98 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.6 | -0.70 | 2001 | 1490 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +45 | — | 38.2% | -0.88 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.9 | +0.20 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1513 | 111.3 | -2.54 | -1.08 | 0.912 | 48.0% | +6 | +48 | — | 37.2% | -0.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.6 | +1.00 | 2002 | 1514 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +72 | — | 53.3% | -0.13 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | +0.40 |
| 23 | 2008 | 1571 | 121.1 | -2.19 | +0.77 | 0.946 | 48.8% | +20 | — | -60 | 48.9% | -0.30 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.16 | 2003 | 1519 | 101.5 | -0.43 | -0.17 | 0.693 | 41.3% | — | +60 | — | 41.7% | -0.92 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.05 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1534 | 115.0 | -2.87 | -1.32 | 0.653 | 40.4% | -58 | +59 | — | 37.1% | -0.97 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–1 | — | -0.75 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1552 | 102.9 | -1.56 | +0.46 | 0.603 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 2005 | 1659 | 128.5 | -0.94 | -1.22 | 0.884 | 47.8% | -48 | +8 | — | 54.9% | +0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1544 | 112.6 | -3.15 | -1.99 | 0.886 | 47.4% | -44 | +184 | -90 | 46.3% | -0.27 | 8–10 (44%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.5 | +1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1508 | 109.0 | -1.79 | -1.74 | 0.883 | 47.1% | -38 | +186 | — | 34.8% | -1.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.34 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1496 | 111.9 | -0.13 | -1.61 | 0.950 | 49.7% | -7 | +104 | — | 40.0% | -0.43 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.5 | -0.03 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1469 | 98.1 | -1.31 | +0.09 | 0.917 | 47.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1500 | 109.3 | -0.80 | +0.20 | 1.048 | 50.9% | — | +86 | — | 54.2% | +0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.58 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1514 | 102.2 | +1.09 | +0.50 | 0.951 | 49.0% | — | +93 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.45 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1511 | 101.0 | -0.68 | -1.14 | 0.894 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1489 | 99.9 | +1.69 | -0.59 | 0.918 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.12 |
| Career | — | 1681 | 124.5 | -1.85 | -0.57 | 0.895 | 47.5% | +2 | +64 | -60 | 42.4% | -0.63 | 7–21 (25%) | 12–12 (50%) | 92.7 | -0.05 | — | 1702 | 117.4 | -1.56 | -1.33 | 0.901 | 47.8% | -38 | +97 | -90 | 44.4% | -0.42 | 32–39 (45%) | 21–21 (50%) | 96.8 | +1.17 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 2, 2006 | H2H |
| Meilen Tu | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 2008 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jan 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | 1 | 2 | 3 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Anna Smashnova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 29, 2006 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 15, 2006 | H2H |