H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Astra Sharma vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-2
Ons Jabeur holds a 2–1 lead over Astra Sharma in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 Sydney third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-1 6-3 | Astra Sharma | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 6-4 | Astra Sharma | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2021* | Charleston 2 | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Astra Sharma | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astra Sharma | #401 | #84 | 806 | 1,669 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Astra Sharma | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #112 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #234 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #235 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |