H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ayumi Morita vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 0-1
Edina Gallovits Hall holds a 1–0 lead over Ayumi Morita in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edina Gallovits Hall leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edina Gallovits Hall won the 2010 Guangzhou fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 36
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Edina Gallovits Hall | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Ayumi Morita | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 82 | 126 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ayumi Morita | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |