H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Barbara Hallquist vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1

Barbara Hallquist and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1983 Indianapolis Indoors round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Hallquist
USA Age 69
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 6-2 6-0 Kathy Horvath Match data Feb 10, 1983* R32 Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Horvath 7-5 6-7 6-4 Barbara Hallquist Match data Nov 12, 1980* R64 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Horvath #283 #10 24 1,975 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,563 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,858 0 2
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,775 0 2
17 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,930 0 4
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,799 0 4
19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 1985 23–16 59.0% #34 1,775 0 6
20 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,739 0 6
21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,615 0 0 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,564 0 0 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,602 0 7
23 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,702 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,736 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Hallquist Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1563 110.2 — — — — +45 -63 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.09
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1859 146.5 — — — — -40 -79 — 56.3% +0.44 11–7 (61%) 7–5 (58%) 108.4 +0.14
16 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83 1982 1775 143.3 — — — — -40 +62 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -4.36
17 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -65 +55 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.14
18 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62 1984 1799 146.8 — — — — -83 +206 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.34
19 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 1985 1776 138.0 — — — — -112 +220 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.67
20 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.31 1986 1740 130.3 — — — — -73 +184 -140 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.58
21 1978 1615 117.4 — — — — +32 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.27 1987 1714 125.9 — — — — -43 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.16
22 1979 1564 114.4 — — — — +88 — -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.88 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +7 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1980 1702 131.2 — — — — -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +17 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.29
24 1981 1736 128.2 — — — — -10 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1707 102.0 — — — — -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1567 105.0 — — — — +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1777 121.4 — — — — +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77 — 1976 144.0 — — — — -49 +106 -140 53.7% +0.21 49–40 (55%) 39–36 (52%) 103.2 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.