H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Barbara Jordan vs Anne Smith H2H: 1-4
Anne Smith holds a 4–1 lead over Barbara Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Boston fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1982* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 7-5 7-5 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
| May 21, 1981* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Jordan | 6-4 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-2 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1979* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-1 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-1 7-6 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Jordan | — | — | — | 1,711 | 62 | 100 | 38.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Jordan | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1974 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1977 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,658 | 1 | 1 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,690 | 1 | 1 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,641 | 1 | 1 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,618 | 1 | 1 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,536 | 1 | 1 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 1 | 1 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,490 | 1 | 1 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |