H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Barbara Jordan vs Kate Glancy H2H: 1-0

Barbara Jordan holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Jordan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Jordan won the 1980 Nagoya round of 32 7-5 6-3.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Jordan 7-5 6-3 Kate Glancy Match data Oct 16, 1980* R32 Nagoya WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Jordan 1,692 62 100 38.3% 1 0 0 0 0 1
Kate Glancy 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Jordan Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1975 1–2 33.3% 1,492 0 0
16 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,475 0 0
17 1974 4–1 80.0% 1,551 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,459 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,583 0 0 1978 1–4 20.0% 1,461 0 0
19 1976 1–2 33.3% 1,573 0 0
20 1977 3–2 60.0% 1,619 0 0 1980 1–5 16.7% 1,422 0 0
21 1978 0–6 0.0% 1,530 0 0 1981 2–5 28.6% 1,423 0 0
22 1979 12–20 37.5% 1,658 1 1 1982 14–15 48.3% 1,455 0 0
23 1980 14–17 45.2% 1,673 1 1
24 1981 11–16 40.7% 1,635 1 1
25 1982 8–16 33.3% 1,615 1 1
26 1983 4–12 25.0% 1,534 1 1
27 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,522 1 1
28 1985 2–6 25.0% 1,488 1 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Jordan Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1975 1 2 3 33.3%
16 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 4 1 5 80.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 3 1 4 75.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 15 29 44 34.1% 20 29 49 40.8% 22 20 42 52.4% 3 20 23 13.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Jordan Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1975 1492 95.3 +24 33.3% -2.00 +0.30
16 1976 1476 97.1 0.0% -3.00 +0.39
17 1974 1552 111.5 +71 72.7% +2.00 1–0 +0.97 1977 1460 103.9 40.0% -1.10 0–2 +0.25
18 1975 1583 110.0 +70 75.0% +1.88 +0.71 1978 1461 102.2 +124 27.3% -1.91 0–1 +0.21
19 1976 1573 101.9 50.0% -0.75 +0.45
20 1977 1619 117.5 63.6% +0.36 0–1 -0.48 1980 1422 87.2 16.7% -2.75 +0.30
21 1978 1531 102.7 +7 16.7% -2.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.95 1981 1423 99.0 +111 26.7% -1.47 1–0 +0.44
22 1979 1658 139.3 -115 -133 +102 40.8% -0.63 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.1 -0.04 1982 1455 107.3 +26 +101 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
23 1980 1674 120.9 -165 -51 +56 41.9% -0.73 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 106.4 -0.95
24 1981 1635 113.2 -41 -11 42.1% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +2.07
25 1982 1615 115.8 -92 -27 +106 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.6 -0.95
26 1983 1534 105.3 -52 +160 30.6% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +1.14
27 1984 1522 98.5 0.0% -2.50 +0.08
28 1985 1489 92.2 -32 23.5% -1.94 1–0 +1.20
Career 1693 123.3 -84 -44 +104 40.1% -0.77 11–17 (39%) 12–16 (43%) 98.3 +3.20 1582 100.7 +69 +89 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.