H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Jordan vs Laura Garrone H2H: 0-1
Laura Garrone holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1985 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laura Garrone | 6-2 6-4 | Barbara Jordan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Jordan | — | — | — | 1,711 | 62 | 100 | 38.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Jordan | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,658 | 1 | 1 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,690 | 1 | 1 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,641 | 1 | 1 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,618 | 1 | 1 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,536 | 1 | 1 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 1 | 1 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,490 | 1 | 1 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |