H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Barbara Jordan vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-1

Barbara Jordan and Lea Antonoplis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Barbara Jordan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1979 Dallas round of 64 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbara Jordan
USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-4 7-6 Barbara Jordan Match data Feb 28, 1979* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Barbara Jordan 6-4 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data Aug 22, 1975* R16 Haverford WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbara Jordan — — — 1,692 62 100 38.3% 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbara Jordan Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1974 4–1 80.0% — 1,551 0 0 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,583 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,573 0 0 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
20 1977 3–2 60.0% — 1,619 0 0 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
21 1978 0–6 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,658 1 1 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
23 1980 14–17 45.2% — 1,673 1 1 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
24 1981 11–16 40.7% — 1,635 1 1 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
25 1982 8–16 33.3% — 1,615 1 1 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
26 1983 4–12 25.0% — 1,534 1 1 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
27 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,522 1 1 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
28 1985 2–6 25.0% — 1,488 1 1 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbara Jordan Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 29 44 34.1% 20 29 49 40.8% 22 20 42 52.4% 3 20 23 13.0% — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbara Jordan Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
17 1974 1552 111.5 — — — — — — +71 72.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.97 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
18 1975 1583 110.0 — — — — — — +70 75.0% +1.88 — — — +0.71 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
19 1976 1573 101.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — +0.45 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
20 1977 1619 117.5 — — — — — — — 63.6% +0.36 0–1 — — -0.48 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
21 1978 1531 102.7 — — — — +7 — — 16.7% -2.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.95 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
22 1979 1658 139.3 — — — — -115 -133 +102 40.8% -0.63 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.1 -0.04 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
23 1980 1674 120.9 — — — — -165 -51 +56 41.9% -0.73 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 106.4 -0.95 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
24 1981 1635 113.2 — — — — -41 -11 — 42.1% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +2.07 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
25 1982 1615 115.8 — — — — -92 -27 +106 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.6 -0.95 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
26 1983 1534 105.3 — — — — -52 — +160 30.6% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.14 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
27 1984 1522 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
28 1985 1489 92.2 — — — — -32 — — 23.5% -1.94 1–0 — — +1.20 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 1693 123.3 — — — — -84 -44 +104 40.1% -0.77 11–17 (39%) 12–16 (43%) 98.3 +3.20 — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.