H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Potter vs Claudia Monteiro H2H: 1-0
Barbara Potter holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Monteiro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1986 Indianapolis Indoors fourth round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1986* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 7-6 7-5 | Claudia Monteiro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Claudia Monteiro | — | — | — | 1,620 | 51 | 95 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Potter | Claudia Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–21 | 34.4% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |