H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbara Schett vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 1-0
Barbara Schett holds a 1–0 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Schett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Schett won the 2001 Doha fourth round 6-7(1) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 50
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2001* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Barbara Schett | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-1 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Schett | #97 | #7 | 2,188 | 1,975 | 256 | 227 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Schett | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1996 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1999 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |