H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 18:56 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 2-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2022 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-0 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbora Krejcikova | 7-5 6-4 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 168 | 101 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,954 | 2 | 9 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |