H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Barbora Krejcikova vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 1-0

Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2016 Prague Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Czech Republic Age 30 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbora Krejcikova #192 6-2 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #38 Match data Apr 27, 2016* R32 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbora Krejcikova #46 #2 5,533 2,013 178 107 62.5% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Dominika Cibulkova — #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Krejcikova Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2014 1–1 50.0% #174 1,503 0 0 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,606 0 0
19 2015 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,844 0 0
20 2016 2–5 28.6% #252 1,507 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0
21 2017 6–4 60.0% #126 1,563 0 0 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,754 0 0
22 2018 1–3 25.0% #204 1,543 0 0 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1
23 2019 2–1 66.7% #131 1,545 0 0 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,791 0 2
24 2020 9–5 64.3% #65 1,700 0 0 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,735 0 3
25 2021 44–16 73.3% #5 1,942 1 3 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4
26 2022 26–15 63.4% #22 1,909 1 5 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2023 32–18 64.0% #10 1,906 1 7 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2024 21–16 56.8% #10 1,896 2 8 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2025 16–10 61.5% #65 1,902 2 8 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8
30 2026 18–12 60.0% #46 1,876 2 9 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbora Krejcikova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2019 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 26 12 38 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2022 22 10 32 68.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2023 23 12 35 65.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
28 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2025 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
30 2026 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 65 174 62.6% 39 29 68 57.4% 30 13 43 69.8% — — — — — 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/285 of Barbora Krejcikova's and 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbora Krejcikova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2014 2/2 2.5 3.0 69.1% 64.0% 38.7% 62.3% 62.5% 56.4% 47.6% 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6%
20 2016 7/7 2.4 4.3 60.3% 65.0% 42.6% 61.7% 46.6% 55.6% 42.1% 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9%
21 2017 9/10 3.2 4.1 60.2% 64.5% 41.8% 58.0% 36.3% 55.4% 46.9% 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9%
22 2018 4/4 2.5 4.5 49.7% 60.1% 43.0% 45.7% 42.1% 51.0% 45.4% 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0%
23 2019 3/3 1.3 0.7 77.5% 60.2% 47.2% 68.5% 55.0% 57.4% 48.5% 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0%
24 2020 14/14 3.5 3.5 63.9% 67.2% 41.3% 52.9% 43.0% 57.9% 45.1% 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9%
25 2021 57/60 3.5 4.0 59.1% 70.1% 50.2% 60.5% 50.6% 62.0% 45.0% 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7%
26 2022 40/41 3.6 4.7 59.9% 70.3% 47.5% 57.0% 51.0% 61.1% 45.0% 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0%
27 2023 48/50 3.4 4.1 59.8% 69.9% 46.8% 52.2% 50.9% 60.6% 44.3% 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0%
28 2024 32/37 3.5 4.3 63.0% 68.6% 45.2% 55.9% 47.8% 60.1% 42.5% 2017 46/48 0.8 2.9 66.1% 62.2% 48.0% 55.2% 49.2% 57.4% 45.5%
29 2025 22/26 3.2 5.5 59.6% 67.2% 44.4% 53.5% 53.0% 58.0% 44.1% 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3%
30 2026 27/31 4.2 4.6 61.5% 69.2% 47.2% 56.6% 47.6% 60.8% 44.6% 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4%
Career — 265/286 3.4 4.3 60.6% 68.8% 46.6% 56.4% 49.2% 60.0% 44.5% — 558/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 46.9% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbora Krejcikova Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 — +0.22
18 2014 1504 102.8 -0.26 +0.43 1.090 52.0% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.14 2007 1607 123.8 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.8 +0.12
19 2015 1489 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09 2008 1844 155.7 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -7 -146 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.70
20 2016 1508 113.7 +0.66 +0.02 0.949 49.1% +26 +26 — 38.9% -0.67 1–3 (25%) — — -0.80 2009 1736 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +83 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.6 +0.20
21 2017 1564 115.5 +0.38 +1.03 1.052 51.1% — +111 — 47.4% -0.05 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -0.09 2010 1754 142.8 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -25 +62 -78 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 +0.41
22 2018 1544 112.6 -2.26 +1.26 0.925 48.1% -34 — — 14.3% -1.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 2011 1895 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -33 -108 -89 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) 108.0 -1.26
23 2019 1546 98.3 -0.20 +0.69 1.139 53.5% — +58 — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.30 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) 97.7 +0.95
24 2020 1700 133.2 +1.74 +1.17 1.071 51.2% -61 -17 — 59.5% +0.38 5–4 (56%) 2–0 — +0.28 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +40 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 98.9 +0.89
25 2021 1943 158.0 +4.93 +2.86 1.184 53.4% -68 +46 -256 66.2% +1.44 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 111.8 -0.54 2014 1720 152.7 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +49 +16 +27 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.4 -0.25
26 2022 1910 149.3 +3.27 +2.35 1.156 52.8% +41 -8 -231 61.5% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 99.8 +0.24 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 — -23 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.11
27 2023 1906 157.8 +4.11 +1.82 1.123 52.4% +67 -60 -137 61.0% +1.00 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 99.6 +0.43 2016 1952 148.3 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -63 65.7% +0.96 19–9 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 109.9 -1.07
28 2024 1897 140.8 +3.38 -0.19 1.064 51.2% +6 -116 +120 54.2% +0.13 8–7 (53%) 10–2 (83%) 105.2 -0.11 2017 1778 142.3 +1.03 +1.88 1.067 51.5% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 93.4 +2.63
29 2025 1902 138.7 +1.22 +0.87 1.050 50.8% +32 -157 +132 55.9% +0.32 10–1 (91%) 4–1 (80%) 110.6 +0.47 2018 1873 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +2 -109 -25 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.83
30 2026 1876 137.9 +2.57 +1.56 1.138 52.7% +6 -93 +166 64.1% +1.09 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.8 +0.30 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 — 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — -0.69
Career — 2013 150.7 +3.15 +1.64 1.114 52.2% +8 -3 +23 59.1% +0.73 55–39 (59%) 40–28 (59%) 109.6 +0.29 — 1965 150.4 +0.95 +2.81 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.51 116–97 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.4 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.