H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Nao Hibino H2H: 0-1
Nao Hibino holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2022 Prague fourth round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |