H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Petra Martic H2H: 1-1
Barbora Krejcikova and Petra Martic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay, while Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 Zhengzhou fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2023* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 7-5 6-1 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| May 3, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Petra Martic | 6-3 7-6(1) | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Petra Martic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |