H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Yafan Wang H2H: 1-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Yafan Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2016 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-4 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2016* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Yafan Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Krejcikova | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |