H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-0
Barbora Strycova holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2009 Monterrey third round 6-3 2-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2009* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Strycova | 6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Strycova | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |