H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 2-1
Barbora Strycova holds a 2–1 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2014 Wuhan second round 7-6(5) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2014* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbora Strycova | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2011* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-1 6-3 | Barbora Strycova | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Barbora Strycova | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Strycova | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |