H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Emilie Loit H2H: 0-1

Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2004 Strasbourg Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #32 6-3 6-1 Barbora Strycova #76 Match data May 22, 2004* QF Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Barbora Strycova Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Barbora Strycova Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7% 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3% 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0% 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1% 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1% 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0% 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
31 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Barbora Strycova Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.