H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 4-3

Barbora Strycova holds a 4–3 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 2–1 on clay, while Eugenie Bouchard leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2017 Eastbourne second round 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Eugenie Bouchard
CAN Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2017* Eastbourne WTA 500 R64 Grass Barbora Strycova #23 6-3 3-6 6-2 Eugenie Bouchard #61 Match data
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Barbora Strycova #20 6-4 6-0 Eugenie Bouchard #40 Match data
May 13, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Barbora Strycova #36 6-1 6-0 Eugenie Bouchard #46 Match data
May 6, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Barbora Strycova #23 0-6 6-3 6-3 Eugenie Bouchard #6 Match data
Aug 31, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Eugenie Bouchard #8 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 Barbora Strycova #29 Match data
May 22, 2014* Nuremberg WTA 250 R32 Clay Eugenie Bouchard #19 6-0 6-3 Barbora Strycova #63 Match data
Oct 12, 2013* Osaka WTA 250 QF Hard Eugenie Bouchard #35 2-6 6-4 6-1 Barbora Strycova #108 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,926 156 144 52.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Eugenie Bouchard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0
18 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,547 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,752 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,834 0 1
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,678 0 1
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2016 28–22 56.0% #46 1,699 0 1
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0 2017 10–19 34.5% #81 1,604 0 1
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,616 0 1
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,712 0 1
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,703 0 1
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,630 0 1
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,635 0 1
30 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2 2025 1–1 50.0% #1002 1,609 0 1
32 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —