H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Belinda Cordwell vs Julie Richardson H2H: 1-1
Belinda Cordwell and Julie Richardson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Cordwell leads 1–0 on carpet, while Julie Richardson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Richardson won the 1990 Wellington third round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1990* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Richardson | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Belinda Cordwell | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1988* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Belinda Cordwell | 6-2 7-6 | Julie Richardson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Cordwell | — | — | — | 1,833 | 79 | 82 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julie Richardson | #643 | #102 | 9 | 1,575 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Cordwell | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #162 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #157 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #257 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #137 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #556 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #157 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #301 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |