H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Belinda Cordwell vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0

Belinda Cordwell holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Cordwell leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Cordwell won the 1990 Birmingham round of 64 6-7 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Cordwell
NZL Age 60 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Belinda Cordwell 6-7 6-4 6-1 Nana Smith #60 Match data Jun 13, 1990* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Belinda Cordwell 6-2 3-6 6-1 Nana Smith #148 Match data Apr 21, 1989* R16 Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Belinda Cordwell — — — 1,829 79 83 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Cordwell Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 4–4 50.0% — 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1985 9–9 50.0% — 1,582 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1986 1–9 10.0% — 1,489 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1987 5–7 41.7% — 1,516 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1988 20–21 48.8% — 1,613 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1989 25–11 69.4% — 1,753 0 1 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1990 11–14 44.0% — 1,641 0 1 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1991 3–7 30.0% — 1,575 0 1 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Belinda Cordwell Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1985 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1987 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1988 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1989 23 8 31 74.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 47 47 94 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 22 47 53.2% 3 9 12 25.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Belinda Cordwell Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1499 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1495 105.1 — — — — — — +120 43.8% -0.63 1–1 — — +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1985 1583 127.9 — — — — +15 — +54 51.2% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 +0.69 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1986 1490 87.6 — — — — +47 — — 18.2% -2.68 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.74 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1987 1516 101.4 — — — — -30 — +90 42.9% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +1.13 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1988 1613 122.1 — — — — -99 — +78 49.5% 0.00 9–10 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 102.0 +1.65 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1989 1754 136.4 — — — — -43 — — 68.4% +1.21 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +2.91 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1990 1641 107.3 — — — — -24 — +67 42.6% -0.77 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +2.10 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1991 1576 105.0 — — — — -46 — +142 39.1% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.66 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1829 121.3 — — — — -45 — +83 49.2% -0.09 27–29 (48%) 19–21 (48%) 99.7 +7.23 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.