H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Belinda Cordwell vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1

Belinda Cordwell and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1990 Singapore Tennis Open round of 32 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Cordwell
NZL Age 60 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-2 7-6 Belinda Cordwell Match data Apr 26, 1990* R32 Singapore Tennis Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Belinda Cordwell 6-0 6-2 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Feb 2, 1989* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Belinda Cordwell — — — 1,829 79 83 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Cordwell Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1982 4–4 50.0% — 1,495 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1985 9–9 50.0% — 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 1–9 10.0% — 1,489 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1987 5–7 41.7% — 1,516 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1988 20–21 48.8% — 1,613 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1989 25–11 69.4% — 1,753 0 1 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1990 11–14 44.0% — 1,641 0 1 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1991 3–7 30.0% — 1,575 0 1 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Belinda Cordwell Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1987 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1988 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 23 8 31 74.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 47 47 94 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 22 47 53.2% 3 9 12 25.0% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Belinda Cordwell Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1499 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1982 1495 105.1 — — — — — — +120 43.8% -0.63 1–1 — — +1.29 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1985 1583 127.9 — — — — +15 — +54 51.2% +0.24 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1490 87.6 — — — — +47 — — 18.2% -2.68 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.74 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1987 1516 101.4 — — — — -30 — +90 42.9% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +1.13 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1988 1613 122.1 — — — — -99 — +78 49.5% 0.00 9–10 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 102.0 +1.65 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1989 1754 136.4 — — — — -43 — — 68.4% +1.21 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +2.91 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1990 1641 107.3 — — — — -24 — +67 42.6% -0.77 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +2.10 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1991 1576 105.0 — — — — -46 — +142 39.1% -0.61 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.66 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1829 121.3 — — — — -45 — +83 49.2% -0.09 27–29 (48%) 19–21 (48%) 99.7 +7.23 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.