H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Beth Herr vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Beth Herr in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1984* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Casale | 6-3 6-3 | Beth Herr | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 6-1 7-6 | Beth Herr | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1983* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Beth Herr | 2-6 7-6 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Herr | #424 | #31 | 18 | 1,784 | 107 | 128 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beth Herr | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #52 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #132 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |