H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 2-1

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2015 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Ana Ivanovic
SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #158 6-3 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #7 Match data Jul 2, 2015* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ana Ivanovic #16 6-7(10) 6-3 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #68 Match data May 8, 2013* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #41 0-6 6-4 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #17 Match data May 4, 2011* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands — #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ana Ivanovic — #1 6,912 2,118 423 217 66.1% 1 3 2 5 4 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Ivanovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,542 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,849 0 1
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,894 0 2
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2007 51–18 73.9% #4 2,037 0 5
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,987 1 8
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,828 1 8
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,940 1 10
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,872 1 11
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2012 35–19 64.8% #13 1,874 1 11
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,856 1 11
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,048 1 15
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,855 1 15
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2016 15–16 48.4% #63 1,684 1 15
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Ivanovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 26 12 38 68.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 25 12 37 67.6% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 26 13 39 66.7% 10 2 12 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 15 10 25 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 24 13 37 64.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 28 17 45 62.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 39 13 52 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 21 13 34 61.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 288 149 437 65.9% 89 43 132 67.4% 41 23 64 64.1% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 517/633 of Ana Ivanovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Ivanovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/46 1.7 3.0 55.7% 67.6% 52.9% 52.0% 42.8% 60.8% 46.7%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% 2006 37/54 3.8 3.2 55.5% 69.0% 49.2% 60.6% 50.1% 60.3% 47.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 62/69 4.2 3.1 57.2% 71.1% 49.0% 53.4% 51.4% 61.6% 46.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 47/54 3.5 3.4 62.3% 67.9% 49.5% 57.8% 49.4% 60.9% 46.3%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2009 32/36 3.2 4.6 60.8% 65.9% 49.8% 59.1% 53.4% 59.2% 45.1%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% 2010 48/51 3.7 4.5 59.0% 70.2% 44.2% 49.7% 50.1% 59.9% 46.0%
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2011 45/52 4.2 5.0 54.6% 71.9% 48.1% 59.4% 50.6% 60.9% 48.2%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2012 47/54 3.2 3.7 55.8% 69.3% 47.9% 51.3% 48.8% 59.9% 46.2%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2013 52/61 3.9 4.4 57.7% 67.2% 49.3% 55.8% 52.6% 59.7% 48.3%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% 2014 71/77 3.3 3.1 60.6% 67.9% 49.8% 57.6% 51.0% 60.8% 48.4%
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2015 35/48 4.1 5.0 62.1% 68.3% 47.4% 54.4% 46.4% 60.3% 44.5%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% 2016 29/31 2.7 4.2 59.8% 67.3% 42.7% 49.4% 48.5% 57.4% 45.0%
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 517/640 3.6 3.9 58.5% 68.8% 48.2% 55.4% 50.2% 60.3% 46.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Ivanovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 2004 1543 117.5 — — — — +32 — — 41.2% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.3 -0.54
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 2005 1850 150.3 +3.23 +2.55 1.191 52.9% -43 -122 -247 65.7% +0.96 8–3 (73%) 8–1 (89%) 112.3 +0.56
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 2006 1895 151.5 +3.56 +2.92 1.182 53.4% -15 -151 -172 64.3% +1.14 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 99.8 -0.58
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 2007 2037 158.7 +5.51 +3.95 1.216 54.1% -63 -20 -171 65.8% +1.20 15–4 (79%) 6–2 (75%) 111.8 -2.58
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 2008 1987 164.2 +5.49 +3.02 1.186 53.6% -11 +75 -136 67.2% +1.20 12–10 (55%) 7–3 (70%) 100.5 -1.29
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2009 1828 136.2 +3.01 +1.86 1.108 52.3% -1 +191 +30 60.0% +0.80 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 93.3 +1.32
22 2007 1591 123.5 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +12 — +11 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.71 2010 1940 156.1 +3.95 +2.72 1.147 52.9% +5 +25 -133 64.2% +1.10 5–4 (56%) 9–5 (64%) 102.7 -2.93
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -34 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.79 2011 1872 152.0 +4.17 +3.67 1.234 54.3% +37 -18 -24 62.9% +1.43 1–8 (11%) 3–10 (23%) 83.3 +1.25
24 2009 1625 117.4 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2012 1875 150.0 +3.85 +3.01 1.152 52.8% +9 +6 +7 63.4% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 97.2 -0.66
25 2010 1707 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -13 -174 -20 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2013 1857 156.8 +3.94 +4.03 1.197 54.0% +5 +61 -26 61.7% +1.14 8–13 (38%) 5–8 (38%) 91.3 -0.64
26 2011 1710 132.9 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -68 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2014 2049 165.8 +4.88 +5.41 1.235 54.6% -23 -45 -121 73.1% +1.51 13–8 (62%) 12–3 (80%) 108.8 -3.79
27 2012 1668 120.7 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2015 1856 147.0 +1.43 +3.09 1.121 52.3% +30 +80 -5 59.5% +0.82 7–12 (37%) 6–7 (46%) 89.9 +1.19
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2016 1684 127.0 +0.89 +1.59 1.057 51.3% +68 +188 +113 50.0% +0.20 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 94.0 +1.36
29 2014 1611 125.0 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1681 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -17 -9 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -20 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.62 0.756 43.6% 0 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.78 — 2119 159.9 +3.97 +3.42 1.177 53.5% -4 +14 -75 63.8% +1.08 92–83 (53%) 74–62 (54%) 97.3 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.