H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 2-4

Flavia Pennetta holds a 4–2 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2011 Rome second round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Bethanie Mattek-Sands #38 6-4 4-6 6-3 Flavia Pennetta #21 Match data
Jul 26, 2008* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Hard Flavia Pennetta #21 3-6 6-2 7-5 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #59 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Bethanie Mattek-Sands #130 6-4 2-6 7-5 Flavia Pennetta #18 Match data
May 30, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Flavia Pennetta #19 6-3 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #102 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Bogota WTA 500 QF Clay Flavia Pennetta #18 6-3 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #125 Match data
Mar 6, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Flavia Pennetta #68 6-0 4-6 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #184 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Flavia Pennetta #15 #6 3,621 1,982 418 272 60.6% 1 1 0 6 3 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Flavia Pennetta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0 2002 1–3 25.0% #95 1,482 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0 2003 18–20 47.4% #69 1,559 0 0
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2004 30–22 57.7% #38 1,670 0 1
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2005 37–21 63.8% #23 1,777 0 3
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0 2006 29–18 61.7% #28 1,729 0 3
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0 2007 30–24 55.6% #39 1,768 0 4
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0 2008 50–23 68.5% #13 1,900 0 6
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0 2009 52–23 69.3% #12 1,902 0 8
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0 2010 45–23 66.2% #24 1,847 0 9
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2011 31–22 58.5% #20 1,785 0 9
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0 2012 19–13 59.4% #45 1,735 0 9
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2013 19–20 48.7% #31 1,745 0 9
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 2014 30–20 60.0% #12 1,780 0 10
33 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0 2015 27–20 57.4% #8 1,823 1 11
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0