H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 1-1
Bethanie Mattek-Sands and Francesca Schiavone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on clay, while Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2015 Monterrey third round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 46
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2015* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Francesca Schiavone | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| May 6, 2011* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Francesca Schiavone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francesca Schiavone | #486 | #4 | 5,246 | 1,984 | 439 | 367 | 54.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Francesca Schiavone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #80 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #41 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #13 | 1,952 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #15 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #30 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #7 | 1,898 | 1 | 4 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,819 | 1 | 4 |
| 32 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #35 | 1,687 | 1 | 5 |
| 33 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,722 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #78 | 1,619 | 1 | 6 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,562 | 1 | 6 |
| 36 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,594 | 1 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,619 | 1 | 8 |
| 38 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,501 | 1 | 8 |