H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-0

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2007 Memphis Classic round of 32 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #126 6-2 7-5 Lisa Raymond #179 Match data Feb 22, 2007* R32 Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Lisa Raymond
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 46/141 of Lisa Raymond's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Lisa Raymond
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% 2003 7/43 2.3 4.4 53.2% 63.4% 51.5% 58.8% 57.5% 58.1% 46.0%
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% 2004 12/39 4.1 2.8 61.4% 68.5% 46.6% 49.6% 48.7% 60.2% 43.4%
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% 2005 5/33 2.6 4.8 66.3% 51.2% 37.5% 51.9% 31.4% 45.8% 42.4%
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% 2006 21/25 3.0 3.9 60.0% 64.2% 46.0% 46.7% 44.4% 56.8% 37.8%
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 58.8% 68.1% 27.3% 55.6% 50.0% 51.3% 29.3%
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 46/600 3.1 3.8 60.0% 63.9% 45.7% 50.1% 46.2% 56.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Lisa Raymond
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.