H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 1-0
Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2007 Memphis third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2007* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 6-2 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |