H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 1-3

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–1 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2017 Charleston third round 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 6, 2017* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Lucie Safarova #28 6-3 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #122 Match data
Jun 29, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lucie Safarova #29 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 7-5 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #84 Match data
Sep 18, 2010* Quebec City WTA 250 SF Hard Bethanie Mattek-Sands #71 6-2 6-1 Lucie Safarova #28 Match data
Sep 19, 2009* Quebec City WTA 250 QF Hard Lucie Safarova #50 6-3 6-4 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0