H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 3-1

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 3–1 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2009 Ponte Vedra Beach third round 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3.

USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2009* Ponte Vedra Beach WTA 250 R32 Clay Bethanie Mattek-Sands #39 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 Marion Bartoli #13 Match data
Jun 28, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Bethanie Mattek-Sands #69 6-4 6-1 Marion Bartoli #10 Match data
Jun 15, 2006* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Marion Bartoli #27 4-6 6-4 6-4 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #105 Match data
Jul 21, 2005* Cincinnati WTA 500 R32 Hard Bethanie Mattek-Sands #177 1-6 6-4 7-6(0) Marion Bartoli #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Marion Bartoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0