H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-0

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2004 Vancouver round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #168 7-5 6-2 Maureen Drake #160 Match data Aug 12, 2004* R32 Vancouver Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 5/15 of Maureen Drake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Maureen Drake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% 2003 3/11 5.0 3.0 70.6% 61.6% 38.1% 55.6% 53.7% 54.7% 41.3%
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% 2004 2/4 0.5 3.5 59.5% 53.5% 46.5% 45.4% 44.4% 50.3% 40.3%
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 5/133 3.2 3.2 66.2% 58.4% 41.5% 51.6% 50.0% 52.9% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.