H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–1 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2019 San Jose third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2019* San Jose WTA 500 R32 Hard Bethanie Mattek-Sands #674 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 Venus Williams #50 Match data
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Venus Williams #46 6-3 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #212 Match data
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-4 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #124 Match data
May 26, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Venus Williams #3 6-1 4-6 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #45 Match data
Jun 28, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Venus Williams #12 6-1 6-0 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47