H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 3-2

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 3–2 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 2–1 on carpet, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1982 Hilton Head second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 7, 1982* Hilton Head WTA 250 R64 Clay Betsy Nagelsen 6-1 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data
Mar 19, 1982* Boston WTA 250 R16 Carpet Betsy Nagelsen 4-6 7-6 6-3 Anne Hobbs Match data
Sep 18, 1981* Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 R16 Carpet Anne Hobbs 6-4 7-5 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Oct 2, 1980* Minneapolis WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anne Hobbs 6-2 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Sep 11, 1980* Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 R32 Hard Betsy Nagelsen 3-6 6-3 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,842 174 164 51.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,576 0 2
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1978 26–14 65.0% — 1,729 0 3
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,756 0 3
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1980 26–18 59.1% — 1,755 0 5
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,752 0 7
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,679 0 8
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,609 0 8
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —