H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Julie Harrington H2H: 0-1

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1979 Seattle round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Julie Harrington

USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Julie Harrington	6-2 6-3	Betsy Nagelsen	Match data	Feb 8, 1979*	R32	Seattle	WTA 250	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Betsy Nagelsen	#692	#25	28	1,890	266	324	45.1%	0	0	0	0	6	6
Julie Harrington	#175	#70	—	1,741	55	80	40.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen							Julie Harrington
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1972	4–2	66.7%	—	1,511	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1–3	25.0%	—	1,494	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	27–18	60.0%	—	1,724	0	3	1979	3–6	33.3%	—	1,523	0	0
18	1975	18–17	51.4%	—	1,790	0	3	1980	12–17	41.4%	—	1,602	0	0
19	1976	11–19	36.7%	—	1,709	0	3	1981	18–15	54.5%	—	1,724	0	0
20	1977	8–15	34.8%	—	1,678	0	3	1982	6–19	24.0%	—	1,589	0	0
21	1978	13–24	35.1%	—	1,659	0	3	1983	15–16	48.4%	—	1,629	0	0
22	1979	18–19	48.6%	—	1,694	0	5	1984	1–7	12.5%	#175	1,571	0	0
23	1980	22–27	44.9%	—	1,753	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1981	20–21	48.8%	—	1,806	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1982	12–17	41.4%	—	1,705	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1983	18–22	45.0%	—	1,692	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	11–18	37.9%	#77	1,630	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	14–12	53.8%	#81	1,713	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	18–17	51.4%	#46	1,699	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	13–15	46.4%	#61	1,645	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	11–19	36.7%	#109	1,585	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	18–15	54.5%	#45	1,662	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	8–12	40.0%	#96	1,639	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	0–2	0.0%	#337	1,607	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1–5	16.7%	#418	1,561	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0–4	0.0%	#394	1,510	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0–1	0.0%	#692	1,509	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																	Julie Harrington
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1972	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	3	2	5	60.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	13	6	19	68.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	1979	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
18	1975	5	5	10	50.0%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1980	4	6	10	40.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	5	11	16	31.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1981	9	5	14	64.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	7	7	14	50.0%
20	1977	3	3	6	50.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	1982	1	6	7	14.3%	4	6	10	40.0%	—	—	—	—	1	7	8	12.5%
21	1978	3	7	10	30.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1983	11	8	19	57.9%	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%
22	1979	4	7	11	36.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	1984	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%
23	1980	7	7	14	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	5	11	16	31.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1981	5	6	11	45.5%	1	4	5	20.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	3	7	10	30.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	7	12	41.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1983	2	7	9	22.2%	2	5	7	28.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	7	4	11	63.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	9	7	16	56.3%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	6	5	11	54.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	6	10	16	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	3	10	70.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	8	6	14	57.1%	—	—	—	—	5	5	10	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	5	13	18	27.8%	—	—	—	—	4	5	9	44.4%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	12	10	22	54.5%	—	—	—	—	6	3	9	66.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	3	7	10	30.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	84	114	198	42.4%	29	59	88	33.0%	95	80	175	54.3%	35	67	102	34.3%	—	28	31	59	47.5%	12	20	32	37.5%	0	5	5	0.0%	11	22	33	33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																Julie Harrington
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1972	1511	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	+28	—	53.8%	+0.23	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.77	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1495	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.00	0–2	1–0	—	+0.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	1725	133.0	—	—	—	—	-176	-202	+77	57.7%	+0.46	8–6 (57%)	5–6 (45%)	103.4	+0.58	1979	1524	114.6	—	—	—	—	+97	—	—	42.9%	-0.76	0–3 (0%)	1–1	—	+0.68
18	1975	1791	125.1	—	—	—	—	-124	-166	-38	45.7%	-0.44	4–4 (50%)	3–3 (50%)	101.5	-3.05	1980	1602	125.8	—	—	—	—	-16	-20	-127	42.9%	-0.17	2–5 (29%)	2–6 (25%)	94.7	-1.23
19	1976	1709	124.2	—	—	—	—	-65	-116	+70	41.4%	-0.76	3–7 (30%)	1–1	—	-1.73	1981	1725	127.6	—	—	—	—	+24	-106	—	48.1%	-0.03	10–3 (77%)	3–4 (43%)	108.5	+2.87
20	1977	1678	123.8	—	—	—	—	-30	-105	+46	37.9%	-0.62	6–6 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.05	1982	1589	116.4	—	—	—	—	-34	+6	—	31.1%	-1.28	4–7 (36%)	1–2 (33%)	96.7	-0.86
21	1978	1659	129.6	—	—	—	—	-99	-85	+99	40.7%	-0.58	4–10 (29%)	3–7 (30%)	92.4	-0.84	1983	1629	115.5	—	—	—	—	+33	-32	—	48.6%	-0.35	5–5 (50%)	4–2 (67%)	103.6	+2.39
22	1979	1695	122.8	—	—	—	—	-132	—	+12	48.9%	+0.08	8–8 (50%)	1–3 (25%)	98.5	+1.65	1984	1571	105.9	—	—	—	—	+13	—	—	22.2%	-1.83	0–2	3–1 (75%)	—	-0.33
23	1980	1753	130.7	—	—	—	—	-148	—	+40	47.9%	-0.41	7–12 (37%)	6–2 (75%)	102.2	-1.78	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1981	1806	134.9	—	—	—	—	-129	-305	+99	49.5%	-0.18	8–7 (53%)	5–5 (50%)	103.7	-3.53	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1982	1705	123.2	—	—	—	—	-99	-214	+170	47.3%	-0.34	5–11 (31%)	9–3 (75%)	100.0	-0.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1983	1693	126.7	—	—	—	—	-32	-138	+114	46.3%	-0.46	7–8 (47%)	7–6 (54%)	102.2	+0.98	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	1631	126.4	—	—	—	—	+59	-141	+117	41.4%	-0.51	5–7 (42%)	7–3 (70%)	99.2	+0.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	-26	—	+87	54.2%	+0.36	7–4 (64%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+1.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1699	131.1	—	—	—	—	-55	—	+171	51.8%	+0.01	6–7 (46%)	4–3 (57%)	98.8	+1.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	1646	121.6	—	—	—	—	-24	—	+148	46.2%	0.00	5–6 (45%)	4–5 (44%)	97.1	+1.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	1586	116.1	—	—	—	—	-27	—	+128	42.5%	-0.27	4–9 (31%)	5–8 (38%)	93.3	+1.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	1662	126.0	—	—	—	—	-56	—	+96	50.6%	+0.04	11–6 (65%)	3–4 (43%)	105.8	+1.48	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	1640	115.0	—	—	—	—	-81	—	+173	40.0%	-0.60	3–2 (60%)	2–4 (33%)	100.0	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	1608	97.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	0–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1561	105.4	—	—	—	—	-52	—	—	26.7%	-1.67	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	1511	98.5	—	—	—	—	-47	—	—	20.0%	-2.70	0–2	0–1	—	+0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	1509	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1891	131.9	—	—	—	—	-73	-148	+94	46.5%	-0.28	104–128 (45%)	70–69 (50%)	101.1	+0.27	—	1741	124.4	—	—	—	—	+18	-28	-127	42.0%	-0.53	21–25 (46%)	14–16 (47%)	101.0	+2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Betsy Nagelsen's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pam Shriver	1	9	10	Nov 12, 1992	H2H
Sue Barker	2	8	10	Jun 28, 1981	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	1	8	9	Sep 26, 1986	H2H
Rosie Casals	3	6	9	Aug 29, 1985	H2H
Virginia Wade	1	8	9	Jun 15, 1983	H2H

Julie Harrington's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	0	5	5	Aug 25, 1983	H2H
Yvonne Vermaak	1	3	4	May 30, 1984	H2H
Helena Sukova	0	4	4	Mar 22, 1984	H2H
Mareen Louie Harper	3	1	4	Feb 19, 1983	H2H
Kate Latham	1	3	4	Feb 17, 1983	H2H