H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Betsy Nagelsen vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1
Betsy Nagelsen and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1986 Montreal second round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Betsy Nagelsen | 7-6 6-1 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1985* | Indianapolis 1 | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-1 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | #692 | #25 | 28 | 1,885 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Betsy Nagelsen | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #81 | 1,714 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,645 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,608 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,512 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,510 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |