H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Marita Redondo H2H: 2-2

Betsy Nagelsen and Marita Redondo are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 2–1 on carpet, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1980 Los Angeles round of 32 6-1 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

2 – 2

4 main-draw meetings

Marita Redondo

USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Marita Redondo	6-1 4-6 6-3	Betsy Nagelsen	Match data	Feb 7, 1980*	R32	Los Angeles	WTA 500	Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen	6-4 6-1	Marita Redondo	Match data	Jan 31, 1980*	R32	Seattle	WTA 250	Carpet
Marita Redondo	7-5 6-2	Betsy Nagelsen	Match data	Mar 16, 1979*	R16	Boston	WTA 250	Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen	7-5 7-5	Marita Redondo	Match data	Oct 8, 1975*	R64	Phoenix	WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Betsy Nagelsen	#692	#25	28	1,890	266	324	45.1%	0	0	0	0	6	6
Marita Redondo	—	—	—	1,901	136	118	53.5%	0	0	0	0	8	8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen							Marita Redondo
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	5–1	83.3%	—	1,569	0	1
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	11–4	73.3%	—	1,623	0	3
15	1972	4–2	66.7%	—	1,511	0	1	1971	3–3	50.0%	—	1,640	0	3
16	1973	1–3	25.0%	—	1,494	0	1	1972	24–4	85.7%	—	1,802	0	7
17	1974	27–18	60.0%	—	1,724	0	3	1973	29–16	64.4%	—	1,869	0	8
18	1975	18–17	51.4%	—	1,790	0	3	1974	2–5	28.6%	—	1,772	0	8
19	1976	11–19	36.7%	—	1,709	0	3	1975	11–13	45.8%	—	1,694	0	8
20	1977	8–15	34.8%	—	1,678	0	3	1976	16–17	48.5%	—	1,785	0	8
21	1978	13–24	35.1%	—	1,659	0	3	1977	0–1	0.0%	—	1,770	0	8
22	1979	18–19	48.6%	—	1,694	0	5	1978	19–17	52.8%	—	1,822	0	8
23	1980	22–27	44.9%	—	1,753	0	5	1979	11–19	36.7%	—	1,749	0	8
24	1981	20–21	48.8%	—	1,806	0	6	1980	5–14	26.3%	—	1,663	0	8
25	1982	12–17	41.4%	—	1,705	0	6	1981	0–4	0.0%	—	1,610	0	8
26	1983	18–22	45.0%	—	1,692	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	11–18	37.9%	#77	1,630	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	14–12	53.8%	#81	1,713	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	18–17	51.4%	#46	1,699	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	13–15	46.4%	#61	1,645	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	11–19	36.7%	#109	1,585	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	18–15	54.5%	#45	1,662	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	8–12	40.0%	#96	1,639	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	0–2	0.0%	#337	1,607	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1–5	16.7%	#418	1,561	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0–4	0.0%	#394	1,510	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0–1	0.0%	#692	1,509	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																	Marita Redondo
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	5	1	6	83.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	11	4	15	73.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1972	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1971	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1972	10	0	10	100.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	8	2	10	80.0%	—	—	—	—
17	1974	3	2	5	60.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	13	6	19	68.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	1973	9	4	13	69.2%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	4	10	60.0%	11	6	17	64.7%
18	1975	5	5	10	50.0%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1974	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
19	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	5	11	16	31.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1975	0	2	2	0.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%
20	1977	3	3	6	50.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	13	11	24	54.2%
21	1978	3	7	10	30.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1977	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1979	4	7	11	36.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	1978	7	5	12	58.3%	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	9	10	19	47.4%
23	1980	7	7	14	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	5	11	16	31.3%	1979	3	4	7	42.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	8	11	19	42.1%
24	1981	5	6	11	45.5%	1	4	5	20.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	3	7	10	30.0%	1980	1	4	5	20.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	7	11	36.4%
25	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	7	12	41.7%	1981	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	4	4	0.0%
26	1983	2	7	9	22.2%	2	5	7	28.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	7	4	11	63.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	9	7	16	56.3%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	6	5	11	54.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	6	10	16	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	3	10	70.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	8	6	14	57.1%	—	—	—	—	5	5	10	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	5	13	18	27.8%	—	—	—	—	4	5	9	44.4%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	12	10	22	54.5%	—	—	—	—	6	3	9	66.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	3	7	10	30.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	84	114	198	42.4%	29	59	88	33.0%	95	80	175	54.3%	35	67	102	34.3%	—	47	30	77	61.0%	11	14	25	44.0%	20	17	37	54.1%	51	54	105	48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																Marita Redondo
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1969	1569	113.8	—	—	—	—	+113	—	—	83.3%	+2.42	—	—	—	+1.54
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1970	1623	120.3	—	—	—	—	+139	—	—	68.8%	+1.94	2–2 (50%)	—	—	+3.88
15	1972	1511	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	+28	—	53.8%	+0.23	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.77	1971	1640	107.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	-49	46.7%	-0.13	2–1 (67%)	2–1 (67%)	102.5	0.00
16	1973	1495	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.00	0–2	1–0	—	+0.55	1972	1802	133.1	—	—	—	—	+121	-257	-90	81.7%	+2.48	3–1 (75%)	3–0 (100%)	105.3	+4.96
17	1974	1725	133.0	—	—	—	—	-176	-202	+77	57.7%	+0.46	8–6 (57%)	5–6 (45%)	103.4	+0.58	1973	1870	133.0	—	—	—	—	+64	-267	-112	61.6%	+0.75	10–3 (77%)	2–2 (50%)	104.6	+0.66
18	1975	1791	125.1	—	—	—	—	-124	-166	-38	45.7%	-0.44	4–4 (50%)	3–3 (50%)	101.5	-3.05	1974	1772	96.7	—	—	—	—	+58	—	—	33.3%	-1.25	0–2	—	—	+0.93
19	1976	1709	124.2	—	—	—	—	-65	-116	+70	41.4%	-0.76	3–7 (30%)	1–1	—	-1.73	1975	1694	119.8	—	—	—	—	+67	-82	—	44.6%	-0.52	5–3 (63%)	2–0	—	+0.37
20	1977	1678	123.8	—	—	—	—	-30	-105	+46	37.9%	-0.62	6–6 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.05	1976	1786	148.4	—	—	—	—	+68	-173	—	50.0%	+0.29	6–4 (60%)	2–3 (40%)	106.1	-0.82
21	1978	1659	129.6	—	—	—	—	-99	-85	+99	40.7%	-0.58	4–10 (29%)	3–7 (30%)	92.4	-0.84	1977	1770	99.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	—	-0.09
22	1979	1695	122.8	—	—	—	—	-132	—	+12	48.9%	+0.08	8–8 (50%)	1–3 (25%)	98.5	+1.65	1978	1822	142.6	—	—	—	—	+33	—	-79	51.3%	-0.21	6–4 (60%)	7–1 (88%)	108.0	-0.56
23	1980	1753	130.7	—	—	—	—	-148	—	+40	47.9%	-0.41	7–12 (37%)	6–2 (75%)	102.2	-1.78	1979	1750	137.9	—	—	—	—	+41	—	-40	35.9%	-1.28	3–3 (50%)	3–3 (50%)	100.8	-0.40
24	1981	1806	134.9	—	—	—	—	-129	-305	+99	49.5%	-0.18	8–7 (53%)	5–5 (50%)	103.7	-3.53	1980	1663	116.6	—	—	—	—	-1	—	—	28.6%	-1.60	2–2 (50%)	1–1	—	-0.80
25	1982	1705	123.2	—	—	—	—	-99	-214	+170	47.3%	-0.34	5–11 (31%)	9–3 (75%)	100.0	-0.40	1981	1611	96.4	—	—	—	—	+14	—	—	0.0%	-3.63	—	0–1	—	+0.38
26	1983	1693	126.7	—	—	—	—	-32	-138	+114	46.3%	-0.46	7–8 (47%)	7–6 (54%)	102.2	+0.98	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	1631	126.4	—	—	—	—	+59	-141	+117	41.4%	-0.51	5–7 (42%)	7–3 (70%)	99.2	+0.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	-26	—	+87	54.2%	+0.36	7–4 (64%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+1.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1699	131.1	—	—	—	—	-55	—	+171	51.8%	+0.01	6–7 (46%)	4–3 (57%)	98.8	+1.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	1646	121.6	—	—	—	—	-24	—	+148	46.2%	0.00	5–6 (45%)	4–5 (44%)	97.1	+1.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	1586	116.1	—	—	—	—	-27	—	+128	42.5%	-0.27	4–9 (31%)	5–8 (38%)	93.3	+1.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	1662	126.0	—	—	—	—	-56	—	+96	50.6%	+0.04	11–6 (65%)	3–4 (43%)	105.8	+1.48	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	1640	115.0	—	—	—	—	-81	—	+173	40.0%	-0.60	3–2 (60%)	2–4 (33%)	100.0	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	1608	97.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	0–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1561	105.4	—	—	—	—	-52	—	—	26.7%	-1.67	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	1511	98.5	—	—	—	—	-47	—	—	20.0%	-2.70	0–2	0–1	—	+0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	1509	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1891	131.9	—	—	—	—	-73	-148	+94	46.5%	-0.28	104–128 (45%)	70–69 (50%)	101.1	+0.27	—	1902	138.5	—	—	—	—	+60	-189	-84	52.4%	+0.15	39–25 (61%)	22–12 (65%)	113.0	+4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Betsy Nagelsen's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pam Shriver	1	9	10	Nov 12, 1992	H2H
Sue Barker	2	8	10	Jun 28, 1981	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	1	8	9	Sep 26, 1986	H2H
Rosie Casals	3	6	9	Aug 29, 1985	H2H
Virginia Wade	1	8	9	Jun 15, 1983	H2H

Marita Redondo's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Chris Evert	0	9	9	Nov 8, 1979	H2H
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi	5	1	6	Sep 11, 1980	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	6	6	Aug 16, 1979	H2H
Laurie Tenney	4	2	6	Jul 24, 1975	H2H
Ilana Kloss	3	2	5	Jan 10, 1980	H2H