H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-9

Pam Shriver holds a 9–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 6–1 on grass and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Philadelphia third round 6-1 6-4.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 9
10 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 12, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #31 6-1 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #448 Match data
Jan 3, 1987* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Grass Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #46 Match data
Jun 25, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Betsy Nagelsen #53 4-6 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data
Jun 13, 1986* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #6 7-6 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #38 Match data
Jun 16, 1985* Birmingham WTA 250 F Grass Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen #81 Match data
Nov 15, 1984* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Grass Pam Shriver #3 6-1 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #71 Match data
Jan 29, 1981* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver 6-2 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Oct 17, 1980* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Pam Shriver 6-3 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Jun 13, 1980* Chichester WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver 7-6 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Jun 9, 1979* Beckenham WTA 250 QF Grass Pam Shriver 6-1 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% 1,537 0 1 1978 23–8 74.2% 1,849 0 1
16 1973 1–3 25.0% 1,517 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% 1,798 0 1
17 1974 27–18 60.0% 1,730 0 3 1980 47–21 69.1% 2,027 0 2
18 1975 18–17 51.4% 1,793 0 3 1981 58–25 69.9% 2,122 0 4
19 1976 11–19 36.7% 1,709 0 3 1982 47–19 71.2% 2,087 0 5
20 1977 8–15 34.8% 1,677 0 3 1983 52–15 77.6% 2,161 0 8
21 1978 13–24 35.1% 1,659 0 3 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1979 18–19 48.6% 1,695 0 5 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1980 22–27 44.9% 1,756 0 5 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1981 20–21 48.8% 1,803 0 6 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1982 12–17 41.4% 1,704 0 6 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1983 18–22 45.0% 1,692 0 6 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6