H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-9

Pam Shriver holds a 9–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 6–1 on grass and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Philadelphia round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 9
10 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #31 6-1 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #448 Match data Nov 12, 1992* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #46 Match data Jan 3, 1987* SF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Betsy Nagelsen #53 4-6 6-3 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #6 7-6 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #38 Match data Jun 13, 1986* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jun 16, 1985* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #3 6-1 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #71 Match data Nov 15, 1984* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver 6-2 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jan 29, 1981* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Oct 17, 1980* R16 Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 7-6 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jun 13, 1980* QF Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jun 9, 1979* QF Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
35 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.